https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124383
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > Created attachment 63844 [details] > A patch This patch is definitely wrong. An example is a basic block who's predecessor edge is for an eh edge. That Basic block is almost 100% still probably never executed. You should fix cross jumping instead.
