------- Additional Comments From ken dot duda at gmail dot com 2004-11-14 22:40 ------- Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions
> Did you miss the question? Umm, apparently I did.. the only thing I see in the bug log that looks like a question is this: > Does this imply that I have picked up Dwarf2 as a default? I don't know the answer. The only thing I can say that might be related is that there are assembly statements in my output like "call __Unwind_SjLj_Register"; that (with the --enable-sjlj-exceptions) has led me to believe I'm using SjLj exceptions. Again, let me know if there's anything I can help with. -Ken On 14 Nov 2004 18:04:07 -0000, paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-11-14 > 18:04 ------- > Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because > of sjlj exceptions > > > Ken, > > Did you miss the question? > > Paul > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563
