https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125070
Bug ID: 125070
Summary: RFE: UX improvements to problems with std::format
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: diagnostics
Assignee: dmalcolm at redhat dot com
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Trying to summarize an IRC discussion on #gcc on OFTC
Compare:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/MxTfGafoo (invalid use, missing specialization)
to:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/q5K5WP38G (valid use)
Would be nice to underline the pertinent part of the format string (like
-Wformat does).
Output is hard to read: lots of template specialization failures
Arguably this is just one case of template specialization failure (perhaps we
want to do general improvements here instead?)
