https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125200
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to [email protected] from comment #4) > However, the error message is confusing: > > /usr/include/iso/setjmp_iso.h:69:12: error: missing using std::setjmp; > > Maybe "setjmp shouldn't be in std" or some such were clearer? I think "setjmp found in std but not exported from module" would be accurate and arguably easier to understand, and wouldn't require a special case just for this function name.
