https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125376
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Created attachment 64494 [details]
> gcc17-pr125376.patch
>
> if (lvname != NULL_TREE && lvd->nest_depth == 0) buf =
> xasprintf ("%s", IDENTIFIER_POINTER (lvname)); else if (lvname !=
> NULL_TREE) buf = xasprintf ("%s_%u_%u", IDENTIFIER_POINTER (lvname),
> lvd->nest_depth, lvd->bind_indx); else buf = xasprintf
> ("_D%u_%u_%u", lvd->nest_depth, lvd->bind_indx,
> serial++);
> is really a bad idea. While at least _Coro_* is in implementation
> namespace, though one can still define parameters like _Coro_q2___unnamed
> and get clashes,
as you noted the intention was to have some readily useable way to inspect
these in the debugger. I suppose that wr need to add something to
disambiguate.
> the %s_%u_%u certainly is not in implementation namespace, one can have a
Hmm.. that looks like a messed up change; the xxx_n_m style of name used to be
prefixed by '__' to ensure it was in the implementation. namespace.
