https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125388
--- Comment #6 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Matthias Kretz (Vir) from comment #5) > (In reply to Drea Pinski from comment #4) > > Yes it is. > > Use generic vectors here instead. Let the compiler do its job and let it > > decide if to use scalars or vectors here. > > IOW, resolve this via PR90993? That PR got stuck on the question whether the > auto-vectorizer would be allowed to do this (because of FE_INEXACT). It is > not clear to me whether the optimization can only be done by a library > implementation. Let it fall back to scalars then.
