https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118793
--- Comment #7 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- Thanks. There are some people with very large NAMELIST files that are composed partially by hand in my circle who appreciate this change. FYI: The original sample program tested internal and scratch files specifically because other compilers that worked well with regular files failed on those. gfortran did not have a similar problem but it might be useful for a test suite to include testing those. > On 05/28/2026 8:12 PM EDT kargl at gcc dot gnu.org <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118793 > > Steve Kargl <kargl at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl <kargl at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Jerry, > > I've downloaded, applied, and bootstrapped gfortran. > It regression tests fine on x86_64-*-freebsd. The > patch looks fine, but I do wonder if we want/need > to protected a exceeding long namelist line. > > OK to commit. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
