https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125659
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Ah no, because atomic::wait will loop and block again on a spurious wake.
redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Mon, 15 Jun 2026 05:18:41 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125659
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Ah no, because atomic::wait will loop and block again on a spurious wake.