https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126084
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Better testcase:
_BitInt(135)
foo ()
{
_BitInt(135) *p, *q;
{
_BitInt(135) a, b;
p = &a;
q = &b;
}
return *p + *q;
}
The bitintlower pass doesn't handle .ASAN_POISON with large/huge _BitInt as
lhs...
