https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126084

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Better testcase:
_BitInt(135)
foo ()
{
  _BitInt(135) *p, *q;
  {
    _BitInt(135) a, b;
    p = &a;
    q = &b;
  }
  return *p + *q;
}

The bitintlower pass doesn't handle .ASAN_POISON with large/huge _BitInt as
lhs...

Reply via email to