https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126244

--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Christian Herber from comment #2)
> I tried, but could not. This bug is rather sensible, and smaller changes
> make it disappear. I will try to get a gcc 16 up and running and retry with
> that.

Yeah, that's unfortunately common with this class of bugs.  What's the smallest
source version you have (short of compiling the whole project)?  We might still
be able to iterate from there.

Reply via email to