https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126963
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Are you sure...? This simply avoids _1 = ...; _2 = _1; <- .... this copy ... = use (_2); but IIRC lbm, is notoriously "unstable".
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Thu, 20 Aug 2026 05:46:29 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126963
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Are you sure...? This simply avoids _1 = ...; _2 = _1; <- .... this copy ... = use (_2); but IIRC lbm, is notoriously "unstable".