https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126992
Jason Liam <jlame646 at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
--- Comment #2 from Jason Liam <jlame646 at gmail dot com> ---
@Drea Pinski This is different than the dupe. Here, the problem is different.
Here, the problem is between gcc giving different results when a a function is
implicitly called or explicitly called. Note also that here reference qualified
member function is used. In the dupe, there is no reference qualified member
function and also the objet there is const. So, it'd be better to keep the
issues separate for better separation of concerns.
