https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127540
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to François Dumont from comment #7) > What about fixing it this way ? Would this mean that a copy of a moved-from iterator would be in the value-initialized state, but the moved-from iterator itself would not be? > IMHO to detect that iterator's lifetime hasn't started yet is a compiler's > job, not _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode one. A nice idea in theory, but impossible in practice because C++ supports separate compilation.
