[Bug target/127864] umax(x, 1) could be better

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127864

Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|i386: Missed optimization   |umax(x, 1) could be better
                   |for val ?: 1                |
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2026-10-12

--- Comment #1 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Another testcase:
```
unsigned test1(unsigned val)
{
    return val > 1 ? val: 1;
}
```