https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128517

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #4)
> > it would be interesting what changed this.  ISTR we also wanted to get
> > away from using LOOP_C_FINITE - Robin?  The simplest fix might be to
> > simply not set LOOP_C_FINITE for early-break loops.
> 
> Yeah, the patch exists locally but is still rough and isn't well tested yet.
> I guess it qualifies as bug fix, i.e. for stage 3?  If so, I'll post it at
> some point but if it's a stage 1 thing, I'd rather postpone.

I'll meanwhile produced a patch that should be good for backporting, so it can
also wait for stage1.

Reply via email to