https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128620
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1) > Wasn't this already fixed with r17-6124? (= r17-6124-g0f8ee5980094f4) Unfortunately, not - it still happens with r17-6137-ga2a11abfad353f of this morning.
