------- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-12-20 20:12 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Jim, David, can one of you look at this, and maybe revert the patch > for PR13158 because it causes this regression?
Reverting the patch doesn't sound like a good idea, because it will only replace a noticable code-generation bug with a hard to notice one. The real question is why anyone would use -fno-omit-frame-pointer on ia64. That sounds like a bug. Is the code coming from pine? If so, we should see about getting that fixed. In any case, I'll attach a patch that fixes the problem for the test-case. Jim is in a better position to say whether that's a reasonable way of solving the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18987
