------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-23 11:28 ------- Karel, your latest comparison is almost a month old (it was here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg01157.html), and we've fixed a few compile time bottlenecks since then. Can you spare some cycles and send an updated comparison? It's probably still ir.cc where we have regressions, but perhaps not as bad as before *fingers crossed* ;-)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17278