------- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-13 02:34 -------
Just a note that reverting this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01334.html
fixes this regression. Reverting that patch
Jan said that his patch did not change the results of the test, so presumably
something else changed somewhere.
Reverting that patch removes most of the warnings from c90-const-expr-3.c and
c99-const-expr-3.c, although we still get warnings for +0.0, 0.0+0.0, and
(double)0.0.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675
