------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-22 19:43 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] missing ra.h
joel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22 > 12:57 ------- > (In reply to comment #10) > >>Mark, while you're using your RM powers to move the target milestone on >>this one, could you also please use your GWP powers to approve the simple >>patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01258.html that fixes >>this bug? >> > > > I can confirm that sh-rtems builds with this patch and won't without it. > The resulting compiler will also build RTEMS. > > No sh target builds without this fix so I am also politely asking this to > be committed. The patch should says "Returns true" rather than "Returns 1" in the comment; OK with that change. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
