gcc-bugs  

Messages by Thread

• [Bug tree-optimization/61338] too many permutation in a vectorized "reverse loop" pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/61338] too many permutation in a vectorized "reverse loop" pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/61338] too many permutation in a vectorized "reverse loop" rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120907] New: vectorizer creates redundunt vec_perm_expr for reversed access of array liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120907] vectorizer creates redundunt vec_perm_expr for reversed access of array pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120907] vectorizer creates redundunt vec_perm_expr for reversed access of array pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120907] vectorizer creates redundunt vec_perm_expr for reversed access of array pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120906] New: vectorizer create redudant permutation for reversed access of array liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120906] vectorizer create redudant permutation for reversed access of array pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug other/120905] New: Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/120905] Unable to compile GCC 6.5.0 with GCC 5.5.0 on Solaris 10 SPARC (linker error?) tch at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/120631] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE: in decimal_integer_string, at real.cc:2342 when mixing _BitInt() and _Decimal constants cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120904] New: Redundant pointer comparisons after arithmetic not deleted sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120904] Redundant pointer comparisons after arithmetic not deleted pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120904] Redundant pointer comparisons after arithmetic not deleted pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120904] Redundant pointer comparisons after arithmetic not deleted pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120904] Redundant pointer comparisons after arithmetic not deleted pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120903] New: Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120903] Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120903] Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120903] Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120903] Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120903] Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120903] Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120903] Alias information not used to optimize out hand-written buffer aliasing checks andreser-gccbugs at mit dot edu via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug debug/120902] New: void debug (const tree_node *ptr) doesn't work hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug debug/120902] void debug (const tree_node *ptr) doesn't work cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug debug/120902] void debug (const tree_node *ptr) doesn't work hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/120901] New: missing diagnostics about jump into scope after defining of a VLA struct pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120901] missing diagnostics about jump into scope after defining of a VLA struct pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120901] missing diagnostics about jump into scope after defining of a VLA struct pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug cobol/120791] FR: support for MOVEing pointer to pointer cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug cobol/120790] parser bug: ORGANIZATION IS RECORD SEQUENTIAL cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug cobol/120794] extra separator periods lead to syntax error cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug cobol/120794] extra separator periods lead to syntax error cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug cobol/120779] HIGH-VALUE / LOW-VALUE not found cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug cobol/120779] HIGH-VALUE / LOW-VALUE not found jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug cobol/120772] gcobc requires explicit -fPIC cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug cobol/120772] gcobc requires explicit -fPIC sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug cobol/120772] gcobc requires explicit -fPIC simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug cobol/120772] gcobc requires explicit -fPIC jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120900] New: C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120900] C++ passes user aligned struct differently from C hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/105611] std::shift_left/right should not use ranges::next ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/105611] std::shift_left/right should not use ranges::next hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/120899] New: Duplicate diagnostics about jump into scope of pointer-to-VLA variable stephenheumann at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120899] Duplicate diagnostics about jump into scope of pointer-to-VLA type and variable pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120899] Duplicate diagnostics about jump into scope of pointer-to-VLA type and variable pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120899] Duplicate diagnostics about jump into scope of pointer-to-VLA type and variable pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120899] Duplicate diagnostics about jump into scope of pointer-to-VLA type and variable pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/120898] New: ICE at -O2 calling function with old-style definition taking a VLA parameter stephenheumann at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120898] ICE at -O2 calling function with old-style definition taking a VLA parameter rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/120898] ICE at -O2 calling function with old-style definition taking a VLA parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/120242] [15 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4 law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/120736] [15/16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-5375-gbeec291225b cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/120813] [15/16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/120627] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-2186-g9d8ef2711df cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4 law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/120627] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-2186-g9d8ef2711df law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/113524] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for bogus messages, line 10) mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/119944] [16] RISC-V: g++.dg/torture/pr119610.C "terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int' law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/114611] H edit descriptor should flag as error with -std-f95 (or higher) w6ws at earthlink dot net via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/114611] H edit descriptor should flag as error with -std-f95 (or higher) jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/106619] Inconsistent __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ output pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/120897] New: __aeabi_d2h/__aeabi_d2h_alt function not implemented in libgcc pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120896] New: __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ incorrect behavior (depends on instanciation order) kelbonage at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120896] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ value depends on instanciation order pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120895] New: AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120895] AVX data types default alignment is not correct david.partridge at perdrix dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug ada/120106] replace hardcoded gnatmake commands with configuration variables cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120894] New: Usage of std::pmr::polymorphic_allocator<T> is not optimized out m.cencora at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ipa/120894] Usage of std::pmr::polymorphic_allocator<T> is not optimized out pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ipa/120894] Usage of std::pmr::polymorphic_allocator<T> is not optimized out redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/120650] Error of requesting %d from month_day_last is not detected at compile time cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120650] Error of requesting %d from month_day_last is not detected at compile time tkaminsk at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120650] Error of requesting %d from month_day_last is not detected at compile time tkaminsk at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120893] New: SLP costing costs vec_construct while forwprop turns it into vec_permute jchrist at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120893] SLP costing costs vec_construct while forwprop turns it into vec_permute rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120893] SLP costing costs vec_construct while forwprop turns it into vec_permute pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/109116] vector_pair register allocation bug cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/109116] vector_pair register allocation bug kishan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120892] New: Missed unrolling at -O3 due to split-paths acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120892] Missed unrolling at -O3 due to split-paths rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120892] Missed unrolling at -O3 due to split-paths pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120892] Missed unrolling at -O3 due to split-paths law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/120659] ICE: in riscv_sched_variable_issue, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:9879 with -O2 -mcpu=sifive-x280 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120659] ICE: in riscv_sched_variable_issue, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:9879 with -O2 -mcpu=sifive-x280 law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120891] New: [C++20] ICE in tsubst when processing nested template lambda and with in template instantiation marko1616 at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120890] New: virtual destructor on base class variable does not call derived class destructor when using [] destructor Dirk.DeRycke at kla dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120890] virtual destructor on base class variable does not call derived class destructor when using [] destructor Dirk.DeRycke at kla dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120890] virtual destructor on base class variable does not call derived class destructor when using [] destructor Dirk.DeRycke at kla dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120890] virtual destructor on base class variable does not call derived class destructor when using [] destructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120890] virtual destructor on base class variable does not call derived class destructor when using [] destructor Dirk.DeRycke at kla dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120890] virtual destructor on base class variable does not call derived class destructor when using [] destructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120890] virtual destructor on base class variable does not call derived class destructor when using [] destructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/120889] New: [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47 kishan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/120889] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/120889] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/120889] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/120888] New: promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since gcc-16-170-ga670ebde3995 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since gcc-16-170-ga670ebde3995 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120888] [16 regression] promotion of unsigned char and short function arguments sign extends them since r16-170-ga670ebde3995 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120887] New: internal compiler error: in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.cc:29376 since 12.1 mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120886] New: SLP build does not consider operand swapping for commutative builtin functions rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120886] SLP build does not consider operand swapping for commutative builtin functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120885] New: SLP build does not consider operand swapping for conditional commutative operators rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120885] SLP build does not consider operand swapping for conditional commutative operators pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120884] New: internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.cc:14029 since 14.1 mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120884] internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.cc:14029 since 14.1 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120884] internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.cc:14029 since 14.1 mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/120817] [13/14/15/16 regression] Wrong code when compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize for AArch64 target cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120883] New: internal compiler error: in write_type, at cp/mangle.cc:2687 since 13.1 mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/120882] New: internal compiler error in /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250630/include/c++/16.0.0/concepts since 11.1 only with -std=c++23, with c++20 works fine mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/120882] internal compiler error in /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250630/include/c++/16.0.0/concepts since 11.1 only with -std=c++23, with c++20 works fine jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug gcov-profile/120881] New: [16 Regression] -fstack-protector-all -pg doesn't call mount at function entry hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug gcov-profile/120881] [16 Regression] -fstack-protector-all -pg doesn't call mount at function entry by r16-1550-g9244ea4bf55638 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug gcov-profile/120881] [16 Regression] -fstack-protector-all -pg doesn't call mount at function entry by r16-1550-g9244ea4bf55638 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug gcov-profile/120881] [16 Regression] -fstack-protector-all -pg doesn't call mount at function entry by r16-1550-g9244ea4bf55638 lili.cui at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs

• Earlier messages
• Later messages