https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6cf49eaf5ac237c57785dce42c89deac911affa

commit r13-8783-gd6cf49eaf5ac237c57785dce42c89deac911affa
Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon May 20 00:16:40 2024 -0700

    match: Disable `(type)zero_one_valuep*CST` for 1bit signed types [PR115154]
    
    The problem here is the pattern added in r13-1162-g9991d84d2a8435
    assumes that it is well defined to multiply zero_one_valuep by the truncated
    converted integer constant. It is well defined for all types except for 
signed 1bit types.
    Where `a * -1` is produced which is undefined/
    So disable this pattern for 1bit signed types.
    
    Note the pattern added in r14-3432-gddd64a6ec3b38e is able to workaround 
the undefinedness except when
    `-fsanitize=undefined` is turned on, this is why I added a testcase for 
that.
    
    Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
    
            PR tree-optimization/115154
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * match.pd (convert (mult zero_one_valued_p@1 INTEGER_CST@2)): 
Disable
            for 1bit signed types.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * c-c++-common/ubsan/signed1bitfield-1.c: New test.
            * gcc.c-torture/execute/signed1bitfield-1.c: New test.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
    (cherry picked from commit 49c87d22535ac4f8aacf088b3f462861c26cacb4)

Diff:
---
 gcc/match.pd                                       |  6 ++++--
 .../c-c++-common/ubsan/signed1bitfield-1.c         | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../gcc.c-torture/execute/signed1bitfield-1.c      | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index dc34e7ead9f..fda4a211efc 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -2023,12 +2023,14 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
   (mult (convert @0) @1)))
 
 /* Narrow integer multiplication by a zero_one_valued_p operand.
-   Multiplication by [0,1] is guaranteed not to overflow.  */
+   Multiplication by [0,1] is guaranteed not to overflow except for
+   1bit signed types.  */
 (simplify
  (convert (mult@0 zero_one_valued_p@1 INTEGER_CST@2))
  (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
       && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
+      && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0))
+      && (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) || TYPE_PRECISION (type) > 1))
   (mult (convert @1) (convert @2))))
 
 /* (X << C) != 0 can be simplified to X, when C is zero_one_valued_p.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/signed1bitfield-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/signed1bitfield-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2ba8cf4dab0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/signed1bitfield-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fsanitize=undefined" } */
+
+/* PR tree-optimization/115154 */
+/* This was being miscompiled with -fsanitize=undefined due to
+   `(signed:1)(t*5)` being transformed into `-((signed:1)t)` which
+   is undefined. */
+
+struct s {
+  signed b : 1;
+} f;
+int i = 55;
+__attribute__((noinline))
+void check(int a)
+{
+        if (!a)
+        __builtin_abort();
+}
+int main() {
+    int t = i != 5;
+    t = t*5;
+    f.b = t;
+    int tt = f.b;
+    check(f.b);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/signed1bitfield-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/signed1bitfield-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ab888ca3a04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/signed1bitfield-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/115154 */
+/* This was being miscompiled to `(signed:1)(t*5)`
+   being transformed into `-((signed:1)t)` which is undefined.
+   Note there is a pattern which removes the negative in some cases
+   which works around the issue.  */
+
+struct {
+  signed b : 1;
+} f;
+int i = 55;
+__attribute__((noinline))
+void check(int a)
+{
+        if (!a)
+        __builtin_abort();
+}
+int main() {
+    int t = i != 5;
+    t = t*5;
+    f.b = t;
+    int tt = f.b;
+    check(f.b);
+}

Reply via email to