https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48c3e5a4f935d6b8cd9ef7c51995e3b29ceb8be7

commit r15-1000-g48c3e5a4f935d6b8cd9ef7c51995e3b29ceb8be7
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Jun 3 23:07:08 2024 +0200

    c++: Fix parsing of abstract-declarator starting with ... followed by 
opening paren [PR115012]
    
    The C++26 P2662R3 Pack indexing paper mentions that both GCC
    and MSVC don't handle T...[10] parameter declaration when T
    is a pack.  And apparently neither T...(args).
    While the former will change meaning in C++26, T...(args) is still
    valid even in C++26.
    
    The following patch handles just the T...(args) case in
    cp_parser_direct_declarator.
    
    2024-06-03  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
    
            PR c++/115012
            * parser.cc (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Handle
            abstract declarator starting with ... followed by opening paren.
    
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic185.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/parser.cc                         | 15 +++++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic185.C | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index 779625144db..3b2ad25af9f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -23991,7 +23991,12 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
     {
       /* Peek at the next token.  */
       token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
-      if (token->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN)
+      if (token->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN
+         || (first
+             && dcl_kind != CP_PARSER_DECLARATOR_NAMED
+             && token->type == CPP_ELLIPSIS
+             && cxx_dialect > cxx98
+             && cp_lexer_nth_token_is (parser->lexer, 2, CPP_OPEN_PAREN)))
        {
          /* This is either a parameter-declaration-clause, or a
             parenthesized declarator. When we know we are parsing a
@@ -24030,6 +24035,11 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
 
             Thus again, we try a parameter-declaration-clause, and if
             that fails, we back out and return.  */
+         bool pack_expansion_p = token->type == CPP_ELLIPSIS;
+
+         if (pack_expansion_p)
+           /* Consume the `...' */
+           cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
 
          if (!first || dcl_kind != CP_PARSER_DECLARATOR_NAMED)
            {
@@ -24173,6 +24183,7 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
                                                     attrs,
                                                     parens_loc);
                  declarator->attributes = gnu_attrs;
+                 declarator->parameter_pack_p |= pack_expansion_p;
                  /* Any subsequent parameter lists are to do with
                     return type, so are not those of the declared
                     function.  */
@@ -24196,7 +24207,7 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
 
          /* If this is the first, we can try a parenthesized
             declarator.  */
-         if (first)
+         if (first && !pack_expansion_p)
            {
              bool saved_in_type_id_in_expr_p;
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic185.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic185.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2c04afeda00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic185.C
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// PR c++/115012
+// { dg-do compile { target { c++11 } } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3fooIJidEEvDpFT_iE" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3barIiEvPFT_iE" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3bazIJidEEvDpFT_iE" } }
+
+template <typename ...T>
+void
+foo (T... x (int))
+{
+}
+
+template <typename T>
+void
+bar (T (int))
+{
+}
+
+template <typename ...T>
+void
+baz (T... (int))
+{
+}
+
+int
+f1 (int)
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+double
+f2 (int)
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+void
+corge ()
+{
+  foo <int, double> (f1, f2);
+  bar <int> (f1);
+  baz <int, double> (f1, f2);
+}

Reply via email to