https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dac1049c1211e6d06c2536b86445a6334c3866d

commit r15-1243-g3dac1049c1211e6d06c2536b86445a6334c3866d
Author: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 13 15:26:59 2024 +0800

    RISC-V: Bugfix vec_extract vls mode iterator restriction mismatch
    
    We have vec_extract pattern which takes ZVFHMIN as the mode
    iterator of the VLS mode.  Aka V_VLS.  But it will expand to
    pred_extract_first pattern which takes the ZVFH as the mode
    iterator of the VLS mode.  AKa V_VLSF.  The mismatch will
    result in one ICE similar as below:
    
    error: unrecognizable insn:
       27 | }
          | ^
    (insn 19 18 20 2 (set (reg:HF 150 [ _13 ])
            (unspec:HF [
                    (vec_select:HF (reg:V4HF 134 [ _1 ])
                        (parallel [
                                (const_int 0 [0])
                            ]))
                    (reg:SI 67 vtype)
                ] UNSPEC_VPREDICATE)) "compress_run-2.c":24:5 -1
         (nil))
    during RTL pass: vregs
    compress_run-2.c:27:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
    recog.cc:2812
    0x1a627ef _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int,
    char const*)
            ../../../gcc/gcc/rtl-error.cc:108
    0x1a62834 _fatal_insn_not_found(rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char
    const*)
            ../../../gcc/gcc/rtl-error.cc:116
    0x1a0f356 extract_insn(rtx_insn*)
            ../../../gcc/gcc/recog.cc:2812
    0x159ee61 instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn
            ../../../gcc/gcc/function.cc:1612
    0x15a04aa instantiate_virtual_regs
            ../../../gcc/gcc/function.cc:1995
    0x15a058e execute
            ../../../gcc/gcc/function.cc:2042
    
    This patch would like to fix this issue by align the mode
    iterator restriction to ZVFH.
    
    The below test suites are passed for this patch.
    1. The rv64gcv fully regression test.
    2. The rv64gcv build with glibc.
    
            PR target/115456
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/riscv/autovec.md: Take ZVFH mode iterator instead of
            the ZVFHMIN for the alignment.
            * config/riscv/vector-iterators.md: Add 2 new iterator
            V_VLS_ZVFH and VLS_ZVFH.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr115456-1.c: New test.
    
    Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/riscv/autovec.md                        |  2 +-
 gcc/config/riscv/vector-iterators.md               |  4 +++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr115456-1.c         | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/autovec.md b/gcc/config/riscv/autovec.md
index 0b1e50dd0e99..66d70f678a61 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/autovec.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/autovec.md
@@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@
 (define_expand "vec_extract<mode><vel>"
   [(set (match_operand:<VEL>     0 "register_operand")
      (vec_select:<VEL>
-       (match_operand:V_VLS      1 "register_operand")
+       (match_operand:V_VLS_ZVFH  1 "register_operand")
        (parallel
         [(match_operand          2 "nonmemory_operand")])))]
   "TARGET_VECTOR"
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/vector-iterators.md 
b/gcc/config/riscv/vector-iterators.md
index 76c27035a735..47392d0da4c1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/vector-iterators.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/vector-iterators.md
@@ -1574,10 +1574,14 @@
 
 (define_mode_iterator VLS [VLSI VLSF_ZVFHMIN])
 
+(define_mode_iterator VLS_ZVFH [VLSI VLSF])
+
 (define_mode_iterator V [VI VF_ZVFHMIN])
 
 (define_mode_iterator V_VLS [V VLS])
 
+(define_mode_iterator V_VLS_ZVFH [V VLS_ZVFH])
+
 (define_mode_iterator V_VLSI [VI VLSI])
 
 (define_mode_iterator V_VLSF [VF VLSF])
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr115456-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr115456-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2c6cc7121b4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr115456-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+/* Test there is no ICE when compile.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv_zvfhmin -mabi=lp64d -O3 -ftree-vectorize" } */
+
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <stdint-gcc.h>
+
+typedef _Float16 vnx4f __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
+
+vnx4f __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))
+test_5 (vnx4f x, vnx4f y)
+{
+  return __builtin_shufflevector (x, y, 1, 3, 6, 7);
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  vnx4f test_5_x = {0, 1, 3, 4};
+  vnx4f test_5_y = {4, 5, 6, 7};
+  vnx4f test_5_except = {1, 4, 6, 7};
+  vnx4f test_5_real;
+  test_5_real = test_5 (test_5_x, test_5_y);
+
+  for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+    assert (test_5_real[i] == test_5_except[i]);
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {call\s+__extendhfsf2} 8 } } */

Reply via email to