https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ec1d59c1705a21398076893d19e25ac18ff24a5

commit r16-7050-g3ec1d59c1705a21398076893d19e25ac18ff24a5
Author: Andrew Pinski <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Jan 25 15:08:31 2026 -0800

    final: Fix out of bounds access for invalid asm operands [PR123709]
    
    output_asm_insn has an out of bounds array access if the supplied
    operand number in the inline-asm is "big" (>=MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS).
    This makes it so that there is no longer an out of bounds access
    by increasing the two arrays by one and using the last element as
    the fake location for all out of range operands.
    
    This could be a regression because r0-38026-g4f9b4029463bc0 seems like
    introduce the out of bounds access but
    
    Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
    
            PR middle-end/123709
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * final.cc (output_asm_operand_names): Skip over
            opnum which is MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS (invalid).
            (output_asm_insn): Increase opoutput and oporder size
            by 1. For out of range operands, set the opnum to
            MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * c-c++-common/asm-invalid-operand-1.c: New test.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <[email protected]>

Diff:
---
 gcc/final.cc                                       | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asm-invalid-operand-1.c | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/final.cc b/gcc/final.cc
index f376f12e5a8a..b5e8c6e2efde 100644
--- a/gcc/final.cc
+++ b/gcc/final.cc
@@ -3295,7 +3295,11 @@ output_asm_operand_names (rtx *operands, int *oporder, 
int nops)
   for (i = 0; i < nops; i++)
     {
       int addressp;
-      rtx op = operands[oporder[i]];
+      int opnum = oporder[i];
+      /* Skip invalid ops. */
+      if (opnum == MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS)
+       continue;
+      rtx op = operands[opnum];
       tree expr = get_mem_expr_from_op (op, &addressp);
 
       fprintf (asm_out_file, "%c%s",
@@ -3428,8 +3432,8 @@ output_asm_insn (const char *templ, rtx *operands)
 #ifdef ASSEMBLER_DIALECT
   int dialect = 0;
 #endif
-  int oporder[MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS];
-  char opoutput[MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS];
+  int oporder[MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS+1];
+  char opoutput[MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS+1];
   int ops = 0;
 
   /* An insn may return a null string template
@@ -3517,7 +3521,11 @@ output_asm_insn (const char *templ, rtx *operands)
              output_operand_lossage ("operand number missing "
                                      "after %%-letter");
            else if (this_is_asm_operands && opnum >= insn_noperands)
-             output_operand_lossage ("operand number out of range");
+             {
+               /* Force the opnum in bounds to a bogus location. */
+               opnum = MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS;
+               output_operand_lossage ("operand number out of range");
+             }
            else if (letter == 'l')
              output_asm_label (operands[opnum]);
            else if (letter == 'a')
@@ -3558,7 +3566,11 @@ output_asm_insn (const char *templ, rtx *operands)
 
            opnum = strtoul (p, &endptr, 10);
            if (this_is_asm_operands && opnum >= insn_noperands)
-             output_operand_lossage ("operand number out of range");
+             {
+               /* Force the opnum in bounds to a bogus location. */
+               opnum = MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS;
+               output_operand_lossage ("operand number out of range");
+             }
            else
              output_operand (operands[opnum], 0);
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asm-invalid-operand-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asm-invalid-operand-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d8dc79f17a07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asm-invalid-operand-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "" } */
+/* PR middle-end/123709 */
+
+int test1(int a) {
+    asm volatile("%i\n" /* { dg-error "operand number out of range" } */
+                 "505x"
+                 :
+                 : "r"(a));
+    return a;
+}

Reply via email to