https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cf6280a73bfee88a9d0bd5358070679d2ebc84c

commit r15-10814-g0cf6280a73bfee88a9d0bd5358070679d2ebc84c
Author: Robin Dapp <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Feb 4 21:20:22 2026 +0100

    RISC-V: Fix xtheadvector ratio attribute. [PR123870]
    
    As reported in PR123870 we miscompile an RVV-optimized jpeg-quantsmooth
    with xtheadvector.  The core issue is that we forget to emit a vsetvl
    before a -fschedule-insn induced spill restore.  Spills are usually
    handled by full-register loads and stores but xtheadvector doesn't have
    those.  Instead, the regular loads and stores are used which differ from
    full-register loads/store in the fact that they don't encode the LMUL
    in the instruction directly and thus require a proper SEW and LMUL in
    the vtype rather than just the ratio.
    
    This patch makes vlds have an SEW/LMUL demand instead of a "ratio only"
    demand for theadvector.
    
    I didn't manage to come up with a simple test case, though.
    PR123969 has a test but it won't fail without slight changes to the
    16 codebase.  I'm still adding it for documentation and backport
    reasons.
    
    Regtested on rv64gcv_zvl512b.
    
            PR target/123870
            PR target/123969
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/riscv/vector.md: Add vlds to "no ratio" for
            theadvector.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/pr123969.c: New test.
    
    Signed-off-by: Robin Dapp <[email protected]>
    (cherry picked from commit cca779f6b4cfc35c7c771e0604c915b2eecb6236)

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/riscv/vector.md                            |  4 ++--
 .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/pr123969.c      | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md b/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
index 64bea4ed8a82..9e6e9d5be2a1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
@@ -491,8 +491,8 @@
                          
vaeskf1,vaeskf2,vaesz,vsha2ms,vsha2ch,vsha2cl,vsm4k,vsm4r,\
                          vsm3me,vsm3c,vfncvtbf16,vfwcvtbf16,vfwmaccbf16")
           (const_int INVALID_ATTRIBUTE)
-       (and (eq_attr "type" "vlde,vste,vlsegde,vssegte,vlsegds,vssegts,\
-                              vlsegdff,vssegtux,vlsegdox,vlsegdux")
+       (and (eq_attr "type" "vlde,vste,vlds,vsts,vlsegde,vssegte,vlsegds,\
+                             vssegts,vlsegdff,vssegtux,vlsegdox,vlsegdux")
              (match_test "TARGET_XTHEADVECTOR"))
           (const_int INVALID_ATTRIBUTE)
         (eq_attr "mode" "RVVM8QI,RVVM1BI") (const_int 1)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/pr123969.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/pr123969.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ede1a36491af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/xtheadvector/pr123969.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=rv64gcxtheadvector -mabi=lp64d -mtune=rocket" } */
+
+/* In order to trigger the issue strided broadcast must be enabled
+   and we must broadcast integer memory operands via strided load.
+   This is disabled and there is currently no param to change it
+   so the test will pass either way.  */
+
+#include <riscv_vector.h>
+
+void test(int16_t *dst, long vl) {
+  vuint16m1_t v6 = __riscv_vmv_v_x_u16m1(*dst, vl);
+  vfloat32m2_t s0 = __riscv_vfmv_v_f_f32m2(0, vl);
+  __riscv_vse16_v_u16m1(dst, v6, vl);
+  __riscv_vse32_v_f32m2((float*)dst, s0, vl);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.vsetvli\tzero,a1,e16,m1" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.vsetvli\tzero,a1,e32,m2" 2 } } */

Reply via email to