On 03/03/2011 23:00, Mike Stump wrote: > On Mar 3, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Michael Snyder wrote: >> DJ Delorie wrote: >>>> As written, the function will access element [30] of a 30-element array. >>> Um, no? >> Y-uh-huh! > > fight fight fight... :-) There can be only one.
I was just wondering whether now would be a good time to mention that having prime-sized hash tables is only a workaround against the danger of someone providing an inadequate hash function implementation in the first place? cheers, DaveK