On 03/17/2011 05:31 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > So really I think that I should be defining the ADJUST_INSN_LENGTH macro to > handle these patterns. I'll look into that.
What is length used for in the rx port? I don't see any branch shortening going on here; out of range branches are completely handled by the assembler. You might be better off simply deleting the length attribute, so that the compiler skips the bulk of the shorten_branches pass. r~
