Thomas Koenig wrote:
+ if (!(*e)->value.function.esym->attr.pure + && !(*e)->value.function.esym->attr.implicit_pure + && !(*e)->value.function.esym->attr.elemental) + return 0;
I have not followed the discussion nor have I fully read the patch, but what's the reason for allowing ELEMENTAL functions? I understand the PURE and the implicitly pure part. But without looking at the scalarizer, I would assume that the same reasons which speak against non-elemental impure functions should also speak against IMPURE ELEMENTAL functions, don't they?
Tobias
