On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:11 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Nathan Froyd <froy...@codesourcery.com> > wrote: >> As $SUBJECT suggests. The patch looks much bigger than it actually is >> due to re-indentation. >> >> Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK to commit?
Did you run -m32 tests on Linux/x86-64? Many 32bit tests failed on Linux/x86-64: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg02419.html >> >> -Nathan >> >> * function.c (instantiate_virtual_regs): Use FOR_EACH_BB and >> FOR_BB_INSNS_SAFE to iterate through insns. Re-indent. >> * passes.c (init_optimization_passes): Move >> pass_instantiate_virtual_regs after pass_into_cfg_layout_mode. >> > > This caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48282 > -- H.J.
