Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> It's not quite the same information, surely. Wouldn't searchers be > >> directed to an email rather than the bug itself? > > > > Yes, though there is a link in all mails. > > Right, so we are contemplating a reduction in search quality in exchange > for a reduction in server load. That is not an improvement from the > point of view of our users, and is therefore not the sort of thing we > should do unless the server load is so great that it impedes our > mission. It routinely is. bugzilla performance is terrible most of the time for me (up to the point of five timeouts in sequence), svn speed is mediocre at best, and people with access to gcc.gnu.org often observe loads > 25, mostly due to I/O . Ciao, Michael.
