Hi Zdenek, On 05/18/2011 05:24 PM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote: > Hi, > >> How about: >> ... >> @@ -2866,6 +2878,8 @@ computation_cost (tree expr, bool speed) >> if (MEM_P (rslt)) >> cost += address_cost (XEXP (rslt, 0), TYPE_MODE (type), >> TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (type), speed); >> + else if (!REG_P (rslt)) >> + cost += (unsigned)rtx_cost (rslt, SET, speed); >> >> return cost; >> } >> ... >> ? > > this looks ok to me >
thanks for the review. > (the cast to unsigned is not necessary, though?) You're right, it's not, that was only necessary to prevent a warning in the conditional expression originally proposed. Checked in without cast. Thanks, - Tom
