On 05/18/2011 10:31 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Not that I'm too excited to see GCC built with a C++ compiler (or even C++ features being used).
Hmmm, you think using "false" as a value for a pointer-returning function is just A-OK ?
Duh, I'm glad I'm using Fortran, where the programmer isn't even supposed to know what the value of .FALSE. is, because it is implementation dependent.
-- Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
