Hi, > + sa_cost = (TREE_CODE (expr) != MINUS_EXPR > + ? shiftadd_cost[speed][mode][m] > + : (mult == op1 > + ? shiftsub1_cost[speed][mode][m] > + : shiftsub0_cost[speed][mode][m])); > + res = new_cost (sa_cost, 0); > + res = add_costs (res, mult == op1 ? cost0 : cost1);
just forgetting the cost of the other operand does not seem correct -- what if it contains some more complicated subexpression? Zdenek
