Hi, On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > + tree base = get_base_address (lhs);
>
> Probably easier and more complete to do
>
> if (lhs && TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME)
> {
> tree base = get_base_address (lhs);
>
>
> I don't like the patch too much, but it looks reasonable. At least
> reverting your patch doesn't really fix anything.
>
> Any opinions from others?
It's ugly. But ... well, IMHO such hacks are acceptable for released
branches.
Ciao,
Michael.
