Hi, On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > + tree base = get_base_address (lhs); > > Probably easier and more complete to do > > if (lhs && TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME) > { > tree base = get_base_address (lhs); > > > I don't like the patch too much, but it looks reasonable. At least > reverting your patch doesn't really fix anything. > > Any opinions from others? It's ugly. But ... well, IMHO such hacks are acceptable for released branches. Ciao, Michael.