On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > 2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey <s...@cup.hp.com>
> >
> > PR middle-end/49191
> > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
> > * gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add dg-require-effective-target strict_align.
>
> Isn't the test backwards, i.e. doesn't
> { dg-require-effective-target strict_align }
> actually mean !STRICT_ALIGNMENT?
You are right. What do you think I should do, reverse the test or just
rename it? I would be inclined to just rename it, maybe:
dg-require-effective-target non_strict_align
Steve Ellcey
s...@cup.hp.com
