Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the quick review.
 
>> the right test is rtx_equal_p(operands[0], operands[1])
Committed with above changes to the bsetqi_msx, bclrqi_msx and bnotqi_msx 
patterns.

Thanks & Regards,
Kaushik Phatak
www.kpitgnutools.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] 
Sent: 11 June 2011 00:01
To: Kaushik Phatak
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Prafulla Thakare
Subject: Re: [Patch : H8300] Bug fix for bit insn and minor tweaks to insns

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/09/11 01:20, Kaushik Phatak wrote:
> Hi,
> The following patch fixes an ICE that is generated when the compiler tries
> to perform bit manipulation for logical operations when the source and 
> destination address does not match. The testcase is also included in the 
> patch(gcc.dg).
> The additional condition in the insn takes care of the ICE which occurs at 
> '-O1'.
> The other insn's are reordered to give preference to bit instructions using 
> existing
> constraints.
> Ok to apply?
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Kaushik Phatak
> www.kpitgnutools.com
> 
> 2011-06-09  Kaushik Phatak <kaushik.pha...@kpitcummins.com>
> 
>       * config/h8300/h8300.md (bsetqi_msx, bclrqi_msx, bnotqi_msx): Added 
>       condition to disallow non-identical memory locations.
>       (*andqi3_2, andqi3_1, iorqi3_1, xorqi3_1): Reorder insn to give
>       preference to bit manipulation instructions.
>       * gcc.dg/h8300-bit-insn-ice2.2: New testcase.
Can't the operand be MEM (reg) or MEM (const_int)?  In which case
INTVAL (XEXP (operands[], 0)) is the wrong test since you shouldn't be
applying INTVAL to a REG.  Furthermore, if you're trying to compare
CONST_INTs, those are shared and you can use pointer equality rather
than their underlying value.

Regardless, I think the right test is
rtx_equal_p (operands[0], operands[1], NULL)

With that change to bsetqi_msx, bclrqi_msx and bnotqi_msx this patch is OK.

jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN8mMBAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7NjUIAJDylrPPoI6YMk4lfRwclIPT
VCzk31q3DpZ3H5CEv8e6u7DmmJl9ng78uYHXejAqTbpAn/mDOtEWasBIUIhTACFF
UgH3bK3wwhF412Dbr/6ND/dPCMiImzSUR8PC8N6S31k8q5JmXIkfVfX/oKaSH/n6
9VxyIfh7PmGRqjMlH434DyvOvH+qPfN3jSNLVHDvUeVYKI6gnfXtR8tuHTlIw4LO
eiubgvmD4RXa6Nnpeuafs8GyTCRA5jbVU2jf3ZR3jBA08YpS/cSeECd19ytSdVuS
Au20hmDPStkJwr/0kw+QtqeZRg5BP4JWF0COYQJDFQVa64Gt6LEterBmntPJr8g=
=JdgV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to