On Jun 19, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Thanks. Can we get this on gcc 4.5.4 as well?
As commented in the PR, I'd have to see a confirmation that the bug exists in gcc-4.5.x _and_ that the patch fixes it (with no regressions). That had been previously stated for gcc-4.6.x, which is why the backport to 4.6.x. Sorry in advance if it has already been stated, I might have missed it.
