Hi,

Sometime back Chung-Lin noticed that a few of the VFP patterns as below
had the '+' constraint modifiers rather than the '=' constraint
modifiers.

I've now corrected this as follows and tested this on trunk with 
arm-linux-gnueabi
and qemu for a v7-a neon test run. Committed.

cheers
Ramana

2011-06-28  Ramana Radhakrishnan  <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org>

        * config/arm/vfp.md ("*divsf3_vfp"): Replace '+' constraint modifier
        with '=' constraint modifier.
        (*divdf3_vfp): Likewise.
        ("*mulsf3_vfp"): Likewise.
        ("*muldf3_vfp"): Likewise.
        ("*mulsf3negsf_vfp"): Likewise.
        ("*muldf3negdf_vfp"): Likewise.
---
 gcc/config/arm/arm.h  |    2 +-
 gcc/config/arm/vfp.md |   13 ++++++-------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
index b0d2625..edd6afd 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
@@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ typedef struct
    frame.  */
 #define EXIT_IGNORE_STACK 1
 
-#define EPILOGUE_USES(REGNO) ((REGNO) == LR_REGNUM)
+#define EPILOGUE_USES(REGNO) (epilogue_completed && (REGNO) == LR_REGNUM)
 
 /* Determine if the epilogue should be output as RTL.
    You should override this if you define FUNCTION_EXTRA_EPILOGUE.  */
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md b/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md
index 42be2ff..e2165a8 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@
 ;; Division insns
 
 (define_insn "*divsf3_vfp"
-  [(set (match_operand:SF        0 "s_register_operand" "+t")
+  [(set (match_operand:SF        0 "s_register_operand" "=t")
        (div:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "s_register_operand" "t")
                (match_operand:SF 2 "s_register_operand" "t")))]
   "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_VFP"
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@
 )
 
 (define_insn "*divdf3_vfp"
-  [(set (match_operand:DF        0 "s_register_operand" "+w")
+  [(set (match_operand:DF        0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
        (div:DF (match_operand:DF 1 "s_register_operand" "w")
                (match_operand:DF 2 "s_register_operand" "w")))]
   "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_VFP_DOUBLE"
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@
 ;; Multiplication insns
 
 (define_insn "*mulsf3_vfp"
-  [(set (match_operand:SF         0 "s_register_operand" "+t")
+  [(set (match_operand:SF         0 "s_register_operand" "=t")
        (mult:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "s_register_operand" "t")
                 (match_operand:SF 2 "s_register_operand" "t")))]
   "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_VFP"
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@
 )
 
 (define_insn "*muldf3_vfp"
-  [(set (match_operand:DF         0 "s_register_operand" "+w")
+  [(set (match_operand:DF         0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
        (mult:DF (match_operand:DF 1 "s_register_operand" "w")
                 (match_operand:DF 2 "s_register_operand" "w")))]
   "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_VFP_DOUBLE"
@@ -761,9 +761,8 @@
    (set_attr "type" "fmuld")]
 )
 
-
 (define_insn "*mulsf3negsf_vfp"
-  [(set (match_operand:SF                 0 "s_register_operand" "+t")
+  [(set (match_operand:SF                 0 "s_register_operand" "=t")
        (mult:SF (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "s_register_operand" "t"))
                 (match_operand:SF         2 "s_register_operand" "t")))]
   "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_VFP"
@@ -773,7 +772,7 @@
 )
 
 (define_insn "*muldf3negdf_vfp"
-  [(set (match_operand:DF                 0 "s_register_operand" "+w")
+  [(set (match_operand:DF                 0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
        (mult:DF (neg:DF (match_operand:DF 1 "s_register_operand" "w"))
                 (match_operand:DF         2 "s_register_operand" "w")))]
   "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_VFP_DOUBLE"
-- 
1.7.4.1

Reply via email to