On 07/01/11 22:18, Paul Koning wrote: >> PDImode is so far always defined as MODE_PARTIAL_INT which is handled >> quite differently (i.e. by not handling it very much at all). IMO it >> would be a bad idea to overload the name. > > Would it make sense to fix the "not much at all" problem?
Ideally once I'm done with all this, people could change their PDImode definitions to FRACTIONAL_INT_MODE with whatever precision they need. It certainly would be nice if a suitable target maintainer applied my 11 patches and tried to test such a change :) Bernd
