Folding of $subject is currently broken (noticed that when playing
with types in pointer_int_sum).  We happily ignore the fact
that the negate operates on an unsigned type and change it to
operate on a signed one - which may cause new undefined overflow.
Seen with the testcase below which aborts with current trunk.

The fix is to not strip sign-changing conversions as already
done for ABS_EXPR.

Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.

Richard.

2011-07-07  Richard Guenther  <rguent...@suse.de>

        * fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Do not strip sign-changes
        for NEGATE_EXPR.

        * gcc.dg/ftrapv-3.c: New testcase.

Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fold-const.c    (revision 175962)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c    (working copy)
@@ -7561,7 +7561,7 @@ fold_unary_loc (location_t loc, enum tre
   if (arg0)
     {
       if (CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (code)
-         || code == FLOAT_EXPR || code == ABS_EXPR)
+         || code == FLOAT_EXPR || code == ABS_EXPR || code == NEGATE_EXPR)
        {
          /* Don't use STRIP_NOPS, because signedness of argument type
             matters.  */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ftrapv-3.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ftrapv-3.c     (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ftrapv-3.c     (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-ftrapv" } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+unsigned long
+foo (long i, long j)
+{
+  /* We may not fold this to (unsigned long)(i * j).  */
+  return -(unsigned long)(i * -j);
+}
+int main()
+{
+  if (foo (-__LONG_MAX__ - 1, -1) != -(unsigned long)(-__LONG_MAX__ - 1))
+    abort ();
+  return 0;
+}

Reply via email to