Hi,

On Fri, 2 Jan 2015 16:41:38, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 01/02/2015 04:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> The misc-inst.cc change looks good but as this is a libstdc++ bug the
>> testcase should be under the libstdc++-v3/testsuite dir and the patch
>> should be CC'd to the libstdc++ list.
> ... and shouldn't be a dg-do run, I would add.
>
> Paolo.

How about this?  I verified that the test case is still able to detect
the missing symbols.
Actually I was not quite sure where to add the test case. Is it OK here?


Thanks
Bernd.
                                          
libstdc++v3/ChangeLog:
2015-01-01  Bernd Edlinger  <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de>

        PR libstdc++/64422
        * src/c++98/misc-inst.cc (string::erase): Add missing overloads.
        (string::insert): Likewise.
        (string::replace): Likewise.
        (wstring::erase): Likewise.
        (wstring::insert): Likewise.
        (wstring::replace): Likewise.
        * testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/types/64422.cc: New testcase.

Attachment: patch-pr64422.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to