söndag 11 januari 2015 03.37.14 skrev H.J. Lu: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Daniel Micay <danielmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/01/15 03:52 AM, Daniel Micay wrote: > >> This branch works well for me. It doesn't automatically turn off the > >> linker flag when -fno-PIE or -fno-PIC are passed like most of the > >> wrapper scripts / downstream patches do, but that might not be a problem > >> in practice. > > -fno-PIE and -fno-PIC aren't linking options. We don't turn on PIE with > > # gcc -fPIE .... > > You need to use > > # gcc -pie -fPIE > > To turn off PIE, you should use > > # gcc -no-pie -fno-PIE > > > Er, Thunderbird did a terrible job handling my manual reply (wasn't > > subscribed to the list). Sorry about that. > > > > For clarity, this is about H.J. Lu's branch at: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hjl/pie It works fine for me but 6 test fails in the testsuite. Do we realy want to pass -fPIE -fPIC when someone do -fno-PIC or -fno-pic?
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-store-ccp-3.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "conststaticvariable" 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/nop-mcount.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c scan-assembler mov(b|zbl)[ \t] (%fs:)?tls_array@tpoff-1\\(% FAIL: g++.dg/other/anon5.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/other/anon5.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/other/anon5.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) /Magnus
