Hi,

As agreed here (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971), please can I reverse Andrew's patch out(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02916.html)?

Tested on aarch64-none-elf, test_frame_* pass.

Thanks,
Tejas.

Changelog:

gcc/testsuite/

2015-01-14  Tejas Belagod  <tejas.bela...@arm.com>

        PR target/63971
        * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Revert to 3 loads of x30
        in epilogue.
        * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Revert to 2 pair loads of
        x30 and x19 (in the epilogue).
        * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c
index b270bae..5b3c0ab 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ t_frame_pattern (test1, 200, )
 t_frame_run (test1)
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "str\tx30, \\\[sp, -\[0-9\]+\\\]!" 2 } } 
*/
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldr\tx30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldr\tx30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 3 } } */
 
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-saved-temps } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c
index 59a089c..6ec4088 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c
@@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ t_frame_run (test2)
 
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp, -\[0-9\]+\\\]!" 1 
} } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 1 } 
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 2 } 
} */
 
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-saved-temps } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c
index d717862..ebfb290 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ t_frame_pattern (test4, 400, "x19")
 t_frame_run (test4)
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp, -\[0-9\]+\\\]!" 1 
} } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 1 } 
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 2 } 
} */
 
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-saved-temps } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c
index b66ce09..b5ea7ee 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c
@@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ t_frame_pattern (test6, 700, )
 t_frame_run (test6)
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "str\tx30, \\\[sp, -\[0-9\]+\\\]!" 2 } } 
*/
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldr\tx30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldr\tx30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 3 } } */
 
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-saved-temps } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c
index 22576c4..daa1f42 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c
@@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ t_frame_pattern (test7, 700, "x19")
 t_frame_run (test7)
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp, -\[0-9\]+\\\]!" 1 
} } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 1 } 
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldp\tx19, x30, \\\[sp\\\], \[0-9\]+" 2 } 
} */
 
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-saved-temps } } */

Reply via email to