On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:58 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2011 02:36 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thunk is in ptr_mode, not Pmode.  OK for trunk?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> H.J.
>>> ---
>>> 2011-07-09  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu...@intel.com>
>>>
>>>       * config/i386/i386.c (x86_output_mi_thunk): Use ptr_mode instead
>>>       of Pmode for vtable adjustment.
>>>
>> Not ok.  This is incoherent in its treatment of Pmode vs ptr_mode.
>> You're creating an addition
>>
>>        (plus:P (reg:ptr tmp) (reg:P tmp2))
>
> It is because thunk is stored in ptr_mode, not Pmode.
>
>>
>> I have a queued patch that replaces all of this with rtl.  I will
>> post it later today.
>>
>
> I will update it for x32 after your change is checked in.
>

I am testing this updated patch.  OK for trunk if it works?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.
---
2011-07-10  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu...@intel.com>

        * config/i386/i386.c (x86_output_mi_thunk): Support ptr_mode
        != Pmode.

        * config/i386/i386.md (*addsi_1_zext): Renamed to ...
        (addsi_1_zext): This.

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index a46101b..d6744be 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -29346,7 +29673,7 @@ x86_output_mi_thunk (FILE *file,
   /* Adjust the this parameter by a value stored in the vtable.  */
   if (vcall_offset)
     {
-      rtx vcall_addr, vcall_mem;
+      rtx vcall_addr, vcall_mem, this_mem;
       unsigned int tmp_regno;

       if (TARGET_64BIT)
@@ -29361,7 +29688,10 @@ x86_output_mi_thunk (FILE *file,
        }
       tmp = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, tmp_regno);

-      emit_move_insn (tmp, gen_rtx_MEM (ptr_mode, this_reg));
+      this_mem = gen_rtx_MEM (ptr_mode, this_reg);
+      if (Pmode == DImode && ptr_mode == SImode)
+       this_mem = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (DImode, this_mem);
+      emit_move_insn (tmp, this_mem);

       /* Adjust the this parameter.  */
       vcall_addr = plus_constant (tmp, vcall_offset);
@@ -29373,8 +29703,13 @@ x86_output_mi_thunk (FILE *file,
          vcall_addr = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, tmp, tmp2);
        }

-      vcall_mem = gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode, vcall_addr);
-      emit_insn (ix86_gen_add3 (this_reg, this_reg, vcall_mem));
+      vcall_mem = gen_rtx_MEM (ptr_mode, vcall_addr);
+      if (Pmode == DImode && ptr_mode == SImode)
+       emit_insn (gen_addsi_1_zext (this_reg,
+                                    gen_rtx_REG (SImode, REGNO (this_reg)),
+                                    vcall_mem));
+      else
+       emit_insn (ix86_gen_add3 (this_reg, this_reg, vcall_mem));
     }

   /* If necessary, drop THIS back to its stack slot.  */
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index a52941b..3136fd0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -5508,11 +5574,11 @@
 ;; operands so proper swapping will be done in reload.  This allow
 ;; patterns constructed from addsi_1 to match.

-(define_insn "*addsi_1_zext"
+(define_insn "addsi_1_zext"
   [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r,r")
        (zero_extend:DI
          (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,r,r")
                   (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "g,0,li"))))
    (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
   "TARGET_64BIT && ix86_binary_operator_ok (PLUS, SImode, operands)"
 {

Reply via email to