On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Tim Shen <tims...@google.com> wrote: > I just noticed that if we want to implement it 100% accurately, > narrowing down the input string to char string is clearly wrong.
Let me take that back, since [22.4.1.1.2].12 requires that do_widen(do_narrow(c,0)) == c, which gives us a chance to use narrow and still be accurate. I think it'll be a quick fix. -- Regards, Tim Shen