On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > On x86_64-darwin, we ICE on one of the pr64307.c testcase, because > expand_thunk doesn't load non-gimple_val arguments into registers > for the first argument, only for all the other ones. > Supposedly normally thunks were meant to have this argument as pointer first > and thus it wasn't an issue, but in the -O0 -fipa-icf case a thunk is > created even for a non-method. > > This patch fixes it by special-casing the first argument only if > this_adjusting - then we know it is a pointer that is being adjusted. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok. Thanks, Richard. > 2015-01-26 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR ipa/64776 > * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::expand_thunk): If not this_adjusting, > handle the first argument in the same loop as all the other arguments. > > --- gcc/cgraphunit.c.jj 2015-01-15 14:05:05.000000000 +0100 > +++ gcc/cgraphunit.c 2015-01-26 17:26:18.629818527 +0100 > @@ -1610,14 +1610,18 @@ cgraph_node::expand_thunk (bool output_a > for (arg = a; arg; arg = DECL_CHAIN (arg)) > nargs++; > auto_vec<tree> vargs (nargs); > + i = 0; > + arg = a; > if (this_adjusting) > - vargs.quick_push (thunk_adjust (&bsi, a, 1, fixed_offset, > - virtual_offset)); > - else if (nargs) > - vargs.quick_push (a); > + { > + vargs.quick_push (thunk_adjust (&bsi, a, 1, fixed_offset, > + virtual_offset)); > + arg = DECL_CHAIN (a); > + i = 1; > + } > > if (nargs) > - for (i = 1, arg = DECL_CHAIN (a); i < nargs; i++, arg = DECL_CHAIN > (arg)) > + for (; i < nargs; i++, arg = DECL_CHAIN (arg)) > { > tree tmp = arg; > if (!is_gimple_val (arg)) > > Jakub > > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)