> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:24:47AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>> > 2015-01-19 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>
>> >
>> > PR fortran/64230
>> > * gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90: Extended.
>>
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
>> Excess errors:
>> /usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lubsan
Sorry for the breakage, guys!
2015-01-27 10:30 GMT+01:00 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>:
> Yeah, if you want to add ubsan tests, you need to add gfortran.dg/ubsan/
> directory and hack up ubsan.exp in there
Thanks for the remark, I was suspecting something like that. However,
for this case it's not really worth the hassle. In fact the test case
does not really need the sanitizer and should also work without it. So
I'll just remove the -fsanitize option:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 (Revision 220180)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
! { dg-do run }
-! { dg-options "-fsanitize=undefined" }
!
! PR 64230: [4.9/5 Regression] Invalid memory reference in a
compiler-generated finalizer for allocatable component
!
Cheers,
Janus
