On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:01:44PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> I want to avoid duplicating the -mcpu parsing logic or the Rube
>> Goldberg mechanism to re-generate the -mXXX assembler directive.
>
> Oh well, I had fun writing the patch.  I thought it reasonably
> elegant, meeting the goals you state above.  You think differently,
> and I won't push my approach further.  The bug isn't important enough
> to argue over.

Alan,

I am sorry that you do not want to finish the patch.  I don't
understand why you find the command line argument so appealing when
the .machine pseudo-op was designed for this purpose.

Thanks, David

Reply via email to