On 02/03/15 01:29, Bin.Cheng wrote:
Hmm, if I understand correctly, it's a code size regression, so I
don't think it's appropriate to adapt the test case. Either the patch
or something else in GCC is doing wrong, right?
Hi Alex, could you please file a PR with full dump information for tracking?
But if the code size regression is due to the older compiler incorrectly
handling the promotion of REG_EQUAL to REG_EQUIV notes, then the test
absolutely does need updating as the codesize was dependent on incorrect
behaviour in the compiler.
jeff
